Skip to Content

What the Tool Is Worth to Me

Anthropic filed to go public. Here is how a creative technologist decides how much to put into the tool, and how much to hold back.
October 27, 2026 by
What the Tool Is Worth to Me
Terence Latimer

Wall Street is about to decide what Anthropic is worth. I have to decide what Claude is worth to me: in hours, in dollars, and in how much of my creative work I let it touch.

What the filing says

On October 26, Anthropic filed its public S-1 to list on Nasdaq under the ticker ANT. The company behind Claude reported $16.3 billion in revenue for the first half of 2026 and an $80.7 billion net loss. Most of that loss is accounting tied to financing, not the cost of running the business.

There's no price and no date yet. Reports point to mid-to-late November.

This isn't advice on whether to buy the stock. It's about a different investment: the one every creative person makes when they start working with a tool like this every day.

Creative first, technologist second

I'm a creative first and a technologist second. I use Claude every day: drafting, research, and the back office of seven brands and a nonprofit.

So I'm not writing this from the sidelines. I'm writing it as someone who has to answer a practical question: how much of myself do I put into a tool I don't own?

How much to put into the tool

My rule: invest in what I can carry out the door, and rent the rest. A tool can change its price or its priorities. What I built around it should still be mine.

What I spendPut in freelyHold back
TimeLearning to brief it well. Clear asks pay off with every tool.Hours polishing work only one tool can read.
MoneyA plan that pays for itself in hours saved this month.Prepaying for a year on a promise.
TrustFirst drafts, research legwork, the boring middle.Final say on anything with my name on it.
My materialNotes, voice guides and processes kept in files I own.My only copy, living inside someone else's app.

Aid it, then assess it

I treat it like a sharp new hire. It's fast, it's tireless, and it's sometimes confidently wrong. So it gets clear direction going in, and a real review coming out.

  • Brief it like a person. Who it's for, what done looks like, what to leave out. Vague asks get average work.
  • Check the facts it hands you. Numbers, names and dates get traced to a source before they go anywhere public.
  • Read it out loud. If a line wouldn't survive being said to someone in a parking lot, it isn't mine yet.
  • Ask the signature question. Would I sign this? If not, it goes back.

The tool does more when I do this work. Skipping it is where the time I saved goes to die.

Influence, not replacement

The tool will change how I create. That's not the danger. The danger is letting it decide what I make.

What it's good at: showing me ten directions when I'd have thought of three, catching the hole in an argument, and doing the setup work so I get to the good part sooner. That's influence, and I welcome it. A good editor does the same thing.

What it can't do: know what I've lived, carry my voice, or care whether the piece matters. If everybody drafts from the same machine, everything starts to sound the same. Taste is the filter, and taste is still my job.

So I keep one habit: I write first, then I ask. The first rough version comes from me: a voice memo, a scribbled page, a bad paragraph. Then the tool helps me shape it. When I flip that order, the work gets smoother and less mine.

One piece of dirt don't make a brick. The tool is good dirt. I'm still the one making bricks.

When the tool has shareholders

A public company answers to the market every quarter. That can bring steadier products and better support. It can also bring price changes, features that chase big customers, and free tiers that shrink.

Anthropic is a public benefit corporation, which means it's chartered to weigh its mission alongside profit. That's worth something. It isn't a promise about your monthly bill.

None of that is a reason to stop using the tool. It's a reason to own your digital real estate: your files, your contact list, your processes, your voice guide. Build the house on land you hold, and let the tools be the furniture. Furniture you can replace.

Running a nonprofit? The same day as the filing, Anthropic released a Claude plugin for nonprofits that starts by mapping where your records live. Here's how Latimer Digital helps teams set it up.

What it's worth

The market will put a number on Anthropic soon. My number is simpler: the tool is worth what it frees me to make, minus whatever it takes from how I make it.

So here's my question for you. What's one part of your creative work you'd hand to a tool tomorrow, and one part you never will?

Sources

JAY-Z 30 at SoFi Stadium: A Creative Technology Review
A video essay on heroes, the creative machine behind a stadium show, and seeing in the age of AI.